Rip Ragged

Truly, this post on C|Net ZDNet (I can never tell the difference) is the dumbest thing I’ve read in months. HERE is the link.

First they take excerpts from a rotten article in the Harvard Business Review. In context the whole article is absurd. Out of context in the hands of Apple-hating flame baiters, it’s frigging surreal.

The essence of the original shit-spew is that Steve Jobs management techniques are all wrong.

The essence of the ZDNet dungfest is to build on the initial out-of-context quotes with their own flame-baiting neophye typist to create the propped-up-on-their-back-legs jizz-jumping honk that Steve Jobs may be hurting Apple and/or the tech industry with his failed management style.

The title of the article is, “Are Steve Jobs’ management skills a corporate risk?”

Yes, dumbasses, there is a terrible risk. The possibility exists that in another twelve years Apple will have SIXTY billion dollars in the bank, since that would double what the stupid loser has done in his first 12 years back at Apple.

If you really want to understand the article, you have to see the picture of the actual typist at the bottom of the page. Look closely. He looks like Pinto from Animal House. Okay, he has a four-day beard in hopes of avoiding that comparison. Dork.

The article appears under the main header of Larry Dignan, Daryl Diaz, and Darrell Steinert-Threlkeld. Listen, Larry, Daryl, and Darrell: The only measure of a corporate manager that means diddle-dee-squat is, “Profitability.” Nobody who buys stocks gives a fat damn about any of that other touchy-feely crap.

By the only measurement that means anything Steve Jobs is an excellent manager.

All the rest of your noise is flame bait.

Unless you’re all idiots.

That sums up the entire list of possible choices.

…

When we was fab…..